Received: from mail.webcom.com (mail.webcom.com [206.2.192.68]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.4/8.7.4-MZ) with ESMTP id WAA13091 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 22:23:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA294265503; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 19:25:03 -0800
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 19:25:03 -0800
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <313fa31c.12838240@mail1.digex.net>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: davep@access.digex.net (Dave Paige)
To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Subject: Re: Reversing an animation
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
On Thu, 7 Mar 1996 08:29:06 -0800, you wrote:
>> This being the case, what good would it do to render with frame step -1? It
>> would seem that you would want to try a reverse import with the PVR. Am I
>> missing something? This doesn't sound like a solution to his problem.
>
> The best way to under stand this,
> is to render something out, using -1 frame step.
> Let's say your client changes his mind,
> and wants the logo you just rendered, to show up
> first, then, fly past the camera.
> Why re-keyframe?
> -1 Frame step, and you're all set.
> The frames will be saved in order, as if the
> last frame was the first.
>
> Dan Ablan
>
The frames will still have the same number as in the foward rendered
